User Group for Rude Members.

[shefjr]

Well damn, I'm late to the party!!

You can't participate unless you give your avatar a mustache. Mine is under the welding mask!
Oh! Wait! you have your whip! you can do whatever you want!:lmao:

 

[manaheim]

Mish's avatar has a mustache... it's just about 1m south of where most would expect it to be.

 

[runnah]

Mish's avatar has a mustache... it's just about 1m south of where most would expect it to be.

And on sideways.

 

[mishele]

Mish's avatar has a mustache... it's just about 1m south of where most would expect it to be.

I don't think so.

 

[AaronLLockhart]

Yeah people are rude now and again. Get over it. You're not going to learn jack **** by hiding in a little bubble where everyone pats you on the back. If that's what you want, there ARE forums out there for it... oh and facebook. This ain't that.

That's part of my issue with the situation, though. Because, see, I wasn't learning anything. From Buckster, yes, and I even openly admitted later that I thought that all of those things pertained to the term I was speaking of, and I was wrong. I will go ahead and tell you. When I am wrong, I am certainly not afraid to admit I am. However, I'm talking about the dude that came in after that saying "You have to admit that it'd be better with the correction."

No, I didn't think it would. I have a decade and a half of Photoshop experience. If I really wanted to correct it, I certainly would have. I simply didn't want to, because I liked it the way it was. Which is where I'm going with this. It is my subjective thought that it looked good the way I had it. Not only mine, but several other members liked it that way also. He was one of two people that didn't. Therefore, he was in no position to down play my skill as a photographer simply because I did not correct the photograph's distortion.

Anyway, that's going off onto another tangent. This has very little to do with only my photograph. This has to do with the way I see other people talk to EVERYONE that posts for C&C. I have seen too many times on this forum, that someone gets called a crappy photographer because they didn't do something a specific way another forum member would have, and that is completely incorrect. Not only is it incorrect, it's unnecessary.

 

[cgipson1]

Mish's avatar has a mustache... it's just about 1m south of where most would expect it to be.

I don't think so.

I'd whup 'em for that, girl!

 

[pixmedic]

Mish's avatar has a mustache... it's just about 1m south of where most would expect it to be.

I don't think so.

I'd whup 'em for that, girl!

or prove him wrong

 

[mishele]

LOL Alright, checkout the nude section.

 

[runnah]

That's part of my issue with the situation, though. Because, see, I wasn't learning anything. From Buckster, yes, and I even openly admitted later that I thought that all of those things pertained to the term I was speaking of, and I was wrong. I will go ahead and tell you. When I am wrong, I am certainly not afraid to admit I am. However, I'm talking about the dude that came in after that saying "You have to admit that it'd be better with the correction."

No, I didn't think it would. I have a decade and a half of Photoshop experience. If I really wanted to correct it, I certainly would have. I simply didn't want to, because I liked it the way it was. Which is where I'm going with this. It is my subjective thought that it looked good the way I had it. Not only mine, but several other members liked it that way also. He was one of two people that didn't. Therefore, he was in no position to down play my skill as a photographer simply because I did not correct the photograph's distortion.

Anyway, that's going off onto another tangent. This has very little to do with only my photograph. This has to do with the way I see other people talk to EVERYONE that posts for C&C. I have seen too many times on this forum, that someone gets called a crappy photographer because they didn't do something a specific way another forum member would have, and that is completely incorrect. Not only is it incorrect, it's unnecessary.

Ahem... The thread train derailed about an hour ago.

 

[manaheim]

Yeah people are rude now and again. Get over it. You're not going to learn jack **** by hiding in a little bubble where everyone pats you on the back. If that's what you want, there ARE forums out there for it... oh and facebook. This ain't that.

That's part of my issue with the situation, though. Because, see, I wasn't learning anything. From Buckster, yes, and I even openly admitted later that I thought that all of those things pertained to the term I was speaking of, and I was wrong. I will go ahead and tell you. When I am wrong, I am certainly not afraid to admit I am. However, I'm talking about the dude that came in after that saying "You have to admit that it'd be better with the correction."

No, I didn't think it would. I have a decade and a half of Photoshop experience. If I really wanted to correct it, I certainly would have. I simply didn't want to, because I liked it the way it was. Which is where I'm going with this. It is my subjective thought that it looked good the way I had it. Not only mine, but several other members liked it that way also. He was one of two people that didn't. Therefore, he was in no position to down play my skill as a photographer simply because I did not correct the photograph's distortion.

Anyway, that's going off onto another tangent. This has very little to do with only my photograph. This has to do with the way I see other people talk to EVERYONE that posts for C&C. I have seen too many times on this forum, that someone gets called a crappy photographer because they didn't do something a specific way another forum member would have, and that is completely incorrect. Not only is it incorrect, it's unnecessary.

Yeah but there's also a significant majority of people on here who really only have about 1/2 a clue, and they speak with just as much authority as those who do.

Again... it's the internet. You gotta' filter and you need to make your own decisions on who to listen to.

Any time anyone comments on my stuff in a way I'm not happy with, I go look at THEIR images... do their images suck? I pretty much dismiss their comment. Are their images amazing? I listen. In either case I TRY to be respectful and appreciative of them taking the time to comment, but whatever... that's not the point.

The point is not to get all offended because someone told you your buildings are warped. Who gives a ****?

 

[IByte]

Lol Manabunny you forgot selective coloring is a no no.

 

[pgriz]

LOL Alright, checkout the nude section.

... massive stampede to said section. ...

Of course, knowing Mishele (kinda), it probably won't be what the eager throngs may be expecting...

 

[runnah]

... massive stampede to said section. ...

Of course, knowing Mischele (kinda), it probably won't be what the eager throngs may be expecting...

Being Canadian, I would think you would be bored of seeing beaver.

 

[IByte]

Well damn, I'm late to the party!!

Surprise surprise

 

[mishele]

Oh, wth, I'll post it here...