I don't do weddings because I see it as being beneath me :mrgreen:
The guy was supposed to be one of the best in his field - and he was cr*p.
Those two statements just anger me. Even with the smiley attached, indicating your at least half-joking, why would any photographer say that weddings are "BENEATH THEM" Furthermore, why would a college waste money bringing in someone who was crap? Everyone in this college was supposed to become a world-class journalist or nature photographer? I call boloney on your "true story".
As one of the "newbies" who came to this forum talking about weddings, I think I can responsd to this.
Before I do so I want to preface it with saying that you, Hertz, and the original poster are coming off as extremly arrogant, and quite honestly sound rather mean... but most amazing is that the OP did weddings. Not once, or even twice... but for EIGHT YEARS!
If that is the case then why do you even need to ASK this question? YOU DID IT...what reasons did you have? I bet they are similar to mine. You make it sound like Wedding Photography was part of your "evolution" as a photographer, and again like Hertz, making it sound like wedding photographers are some lower class photog that doesn't deserve the time of day from truly classy photographer like yourself.
So to the question... why?
Money, surely is a motivating factor. Wedding photographers make money, it's no secret. It's a LOT of work if you're doing it right, and even the new breed of "shoot and cd" (no print) photographer has many hours invested in each wedding, and if they do things right, are paid for it decently. If you sell prints on top of it, your paid even more.
But there is MUCH more to it, or at least their should be. I like people, and I really get along with most people... I am friendly, and am not shy to get up and talk in front of a large crowd. I feel this helps me tackling large groups, like you see at weddings.
Moreover, wedding photography is one type of photography that MOST people enjoy. I mean, some people could give a poopie about seeing the most beautiful picture of a wolf lapping water from a still pond at sunset, but most people love their kids getting married and proudly post those pictures on the wall.
So why do I shoot weddings, and hope to do it more in the future? Because I ENJOY IT... and you did it for 8 years and hated EVERY MOMENT OF IT? I really feel sorry for you... I can't imagine doing something I hated for 8 years just because the money is good. There are more important things in life buddy.
Also, I'd like to address this line in the OP's post:
"I knew what I was doing, a full set of lights, pro cameras and lenses (Hassy) with backups of everything, liability insurance, etc."
So here we are, always wanting to dispel the myths of photography and you are perpatuating the belief that EQUIPMENT = SKILL.... and yet you go on later on to argue that point with yourself. Silly.
Personally, I'd rather have ONE GOOD photographer with a point and shoot then 3 equipment heavy ones that have no idea what they are doing. I did my wedding with a D50, a few lenses and one flash. Sure, more equipment could've come in handy, but I think the results were good... and it was me or the 10 disposables on the tables for this bride. I'm not trying to pretend that quality equipment is not important, but I think too much emphasis is placed on it, especially in wedding photography. Even with unlimited money my Wedding Kit would only consist of a decent body and bakcup, a wide angle, a fast Prime and a decent zoom, and two/three flashes. I don't see the need for much more.
Anyway, go ahead and bash us... the "wedding photogs" consider us "beneath you", but remember, some of us ENJOY doing what we do.