Ilovemycam
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2012
- Messages
- 1,070
- Reaction score
- 113
- Location
- Mid Atlantic
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm surprised breathing in CA isn't illegal since you exhale CO2.
I'm surprised breathing in CA isn't illegal since you exhale CO2.
I'm surprised breathing in CA isn't illegal since you exhale CO2.
I'm surprised breathing in CA isn't illegal since you exhale CO2.
For God's sake, don't give them any ideas! :roll:
On the other hand, a reduction in oxygen intake on their part might be good for the rest of us...
Well, even if it passes, I'm sure the law will be swiftly revisited as soon as multiple California news sources and movie makers become unable to report any stories or shoot half their scenes since they might happen to have some random kids in the corner.
A far easier solution is to just make children illegal.
The original problem may be the public indeed, but you can't legislate people to not be allowed to care about certain news...
You CAN legislate the photographer's actions. That being said though, there's no reason to overshoot the problem massively by outlawing all non-documented child photographs. They could simply make it more illegal to stalk children for photographs. As in, make a law where taking a photo of a child creates higher standards than normal for how you found that child and what sorts of actions constitute stalking/harrassment.
I think a legislative solution is the correct route, just not a REALLY LAZY and simplistic legislative solution like this one.