9,000 Posts IN 7 years, 5 months, 11 days

[Overread16 4]

There is an important lesson here for all rabbits - please love responsibly!

 

[PixelRabbit]

Aw come on, you have to admit you are at least a LITTLE curious what a Manaheim Pixel Rabbit's photography would look like

 

[cgipson1]

EDIT2: I've learned that I am a sleazy attention-whore who posts periodically just to celebrate himself and the fact that he posts.

Hmmmm... if 9k in 7 years makes you a "sleazy attention-whore", what does nearly 13k in less than 2 years make me? I am almost afraid to ask! lol!

I do enjoy your posts.... so keep it up!

 

[pgriz]

Charlie... the answer is "sleazier". But that's IF you accept the original definition. I'm not convinced that frequent posting means you're fishing for attention. Very short (Two or three-word) responses, however, may.

 

[sm4him]

Charlie... the answer is "sleazier". But that's IF you accept the original definition. I'm not convinced that frequent posting means you're fishing for attention. Very short (Two or three-word) responses, however, may.

That's true.

:lmao:

 

[mishele]

Damn you^^^ You beat me to the joke. :x

 

[terri35 6]

Terri, you should let it pass and see if anyone notices. Real friends would notice.

BTW, your post to like ratio sucks.

*sniffle*

 

[jake337]

Charlie... the answer is "sleazier". But that's IF you accept the original definition. I'm not convinced that frequent posting means you're fishing for attention. Very short (Two or three-word) responses, however, may.

That's true.

:lmao:

Word!

 

[cgipson1]

Charlie... the answer is "sleazier". But that's IF you accept the original definition. I'm not convinced that frequent posting means you're fishing for attention. Very short (Two or three-word) responses, however, may.

Sleazier? I can do that!

 

[mishele]

Charlie... the answer is "sleazier". But that's IF you accept the original definition. I'm not convinced that frequent posting means you're fishing for attention. Very short (Two or three-word) responses, however, may.

Sleazier? I can do that!

God, don't encourage him!!

 

[cgipson1]

Charlie... the answer is "sleazier". But that's IF you accept the original definition. I'm not convinced that frequent posting means you're fishing for attention. Very short (Two or three-word) responses, however, may.

Sleazier? I can do that!

God, don't encourage him!!

 

[manaheim]

My goodness... too many responses to respond to individually.

Thanks to those who said nice things.

Thanks to those who discussed bunny love, for bunny love is a fine fine thing.

Thanks to those who picked on terri, cuz... I dunno... I have authority issues?