Derrel
Mr. Rain Cloud
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2009
- Messages
- 48,225
- Reaction score
- 18,941
- Location
- USA
- Website
- www.pbase.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Here are some screen captures I just made, with the two lenses tested on the same camera, the 24 MP Nikon D3x.
Nikkor AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR (FX) - Review / Test Report
"The Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR delivers very good to excellent sharpness in the image center combined with good to very good resolution at the borders and corners. Vignetting is well controlled, but CAs are quite high (though easy to remove in post processing) and distortion is above average for this lens class. We did not formally test it, but noticed in our field tests that the quality of the bokeh can be rough in critical situations specifically regarding the highlight rendering."
70-200 VR-II test begins at
http://www.photozone.de/nikon_ff/511-nikkorafs7020028vr2ff
And now, the comparisons of the results.
147848120.aKR3HntF.70300VRvs7_0MK2_A.png
147848121.NfAr4q8L.70300VRvs7_0MK2_B.png
147848122.xvaRiXeW.70300VRvs7_0MK2_C.png
147848123.e35h6vFN.70300VRvs7_0MK2_D.png
Nikkor AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR (FX) - Review / Test Report
"The Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR delivers very good to excellent sharpness in the image center combined with good to very good resolution at the borders and corners. Vignetting is well controlled, but CAs are quite high (though easy to remove in post processing) and distortion is above average for this lens class. We did not formally test it, but noticed in our field tests that the quality of the bokeh can be rough in critical situations specifically regarding the highlight rendering."
70-200 VR-II test begins at
http://www.photozone.de/nikon_ff/511-nikkorafs7020028vr2ff
And now, the comparisons of the results.
147848120.aKR3HntF.70300VRvs7_0MK2_A.png
147848121.NfAr4q8L.70300VRvs7_0MK2_B.png
147848122.xvaRiXeW.70300VRvs7_0MK2_C.png
147848123.e35h6vFN.70300VRvs7_0MK2_D.png