I bet all those old dudes with arthritis who don't play barre chords a) know how to play them but choose not to because of their ailment; and b) wish that they could still play them. So, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
My point is that you don't "need" to play barre chords to play guitar. The assertion has been made that, if you don't play barre chords, you have to "sit out" any song that has an F or a B chord in it. That's beyond silly, as it's completely untrue...
Care to show me how to fret B and F-major in standard tuning without using a barre chord? You have me curious.
Sure.
Your fingers are numbered, from index finger to pink, 1 through 4.
For an F chord, use "1" to cover the E and B strings at the first fret. Put "2" on the G string at the second fret, "4" on the D string at the fourth fret, and "3" on the A string on the fourth fret. Voila. An "F" chord. You can either mute the low E with your thumb, or wrap around and fret the low E string at the first fret. It's really quite simple to do.
I could do the same type of explanation for a B chord, but I think you get my point...
Yeah, yeah, I saw that coming. I use a capo in over 50% of my acoustic playing. It's a great tool but as a substitute it's half-assed, plain and simple. I'm not going to explain why, because you already know.
I was simply addressing the point being made that, without barre chords, certain chords, and songs, simply cannot be played.
That is an absolutely untrue statement...
Frankly, I can't believe I'm being told by another guitar player that barre chords are not a necessary skill. Never thought I'd see the day.
Um, well... Surprise, I guess.
I use barre chords all the time. Every day, in fact, But the fact of the matter is that a person can successfully play guitar, and play it well, without playing barre chords. I see people do that all the time, too...