I always said that Medium Format Camera's blow away Any Full frame.

[donny1963]

I always said that Medium Format Camera's blow away Any Full frame, how ever many idiots on here has tried to disagree on that, and think full frame is just as good for instance the Hassleblad H6 or H5 will blow away any Full frame camera out there including the NIKON D850 using any lens..

Don't believe me this guy says it all and tells you why..

 

[Tim Tucker 2]

I'm hoping that you may be able to enlighten me a little further. I'm just one of the *many idiots on here* because of the simple *fact* that I don't share your point of view, it is of course *fact* that your point of view is correct because you declared it so. I must therefore be an idiot. Thank you for that clarification...

*A 51MP medium format beats a 60MP FF*, because the MF requires less magnification. How does that work say on a screen? And how does that work in a print? Image resolution is the number of dots, and magnification is change in the number of dots per inch. It's a little more abstracted than size of sensor/size of image.

Then his/your pal, (are you TAP?), has got a gig photographing relics and the minimum entry is a MF camera because of the resolution, (though I thought museums still used 10"x 8" for archival, but what do I know... )...

Now us idiots don't recognise the difference in formats because we are viewing resized jpegs on screens, (DOH!), and don't understand that to see the difference you must look at the full resolution TIFF in print.

But isn't the gig to produce a virtual tour of the museum (EDIT - or reference shots for research), to be viewed as jpegs on a computer screen?

Now all you Bedroom Boffins/Armchair Experts can watch as many YouTube videos as you like but the only conclusions you seem to come up with are ones like "X is a bigger number than Y", and I am struggling to see the relevance of any of it simply because none of it demonstrates any understanding of how to make compelling images with any camera.

Habeas Pictorus...

 

[jaomul]

I thought cameras took photographs. If I want to blow things away I'd get a different type of machine

 

[stapo49]

My camera only has a micro 4/3 sensor. I am screwed! [emoji26][emoji23]

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

 

[Braineack]

@donny1963 who gives a sh1t?

Here's a video from the same awful source, who says sensor size doesn't matter, but within the same video says fuji has MF therefore fuji is better.

Dude is a joke.




go out a take a picture, and post it here, and it better be on MF or it's f'in ****.

When you watch this dude, you do nothing but support his unhealthy eating habits and spread useless crap on the internet. Like seriously, do you ever have a point to your threads? you're not even a good troll if that's what youre trying to do.

 

[petrochemist]

The right tool for the job depends on the job.
MF is a poor choice for things like motorsports, where long lens & quick movement with the camera is common. For the pro's high burst rates are often called for as well, another place where MF tends to be tacking.
In my example FF, APSC, MFT, possibly even camera phones will be able to get shots that the MF cameras will be unable to get at all.

 

[RVT1K]

ANY camera in unskilled hands will produce bad images. And a "lesser" camera, in skilled hands, will produce good images.

 

[pixmedic]

Why even waste time with something inferior like medium format when a real professional who actually wants to get the best results possible would obviously be using a large format camera.

Medium format is for amateur scrubs.

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk

 

[Tim Tucker 2]

@donny1963


Dude is a joke.

WOW! And I mean just... WOW!! The misogyny is so thick you can cut it with a slashers knife.

"[camera brand] is like dating a woman with an incurable STD, no matter how beautiful you can't sleep..."

- Camera zooms out during dialogue revealing taxidermy on the walls, then zooms further to reveal the outside of the building and a large gothic house atop the hill behind -

- A distant shrill cry is heard... -

"Norman!"
​

 

[tirediron]

Define "Blow away".

 

[480sparky]

When you guys finally decide on what is 'the best' camera, let me know. In the meantime, I'll use what I already have 'cuz it gets me the results I want.

 

[Dao]

Good that it only blow away the full frame cameras. My 1 inch sensor Sony survives.
By the way, I'd been telling my friend all the time my Li Ion powered impact driver blow away his small precision screw drivers. He won't listen.

 

[Soocom1]

AS a MF guy, I can tell you that the argument is IMO stupid.

MF is MF is MF.

The enlargement ratio (reproduction ratio) is only argumentative if your using an apples to apples comparison like back in the film days.

But there is still IMO no comparison of formats when you get into the pro end of photography. The new Hassys that have the same tech as the FF and APS sensors if and ONLY if they hit out at the same pixel size (2-3 micron) then were back into the realm of MF taking out small format.
But as so eloquently mentioned above, IF the same tech was applied to large format, all bets are off.

The real problem in the argument is pixel size. if your on an apple to apple, then the argument is valid. if say new 90D 4 micron vs. 9 micron fat pixel, guess what.

But in the hands of a rank amature, this argument is all academic.



so there!


Neeners neeners!

 

[limr]

Let's just pause here and cool our jets, eh?