JClishe
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- May 28, 2009
- Messages
- 828
- Reaction score
- 106
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Unix based Operating systems are known to run for years and even decades with no issues, let alone having to re image a system on a somewhat scheduled basis like what has to be done in many enterprise environments with Windows based systems.
So these Unix OS's that you're referring to that run for years and decades with no issues, these are being used in the exact same scenario as the Windows 7 machines you're referring to, correct? End users are using them to surf the web, download, install, then uninstall 3rd party software, connect to all sorts of different pieces of hardware causing all sorts of 3rd party drivers to be installed, etc.
Because obviously if you're comparing a Unix machine that's dedicated to handful of tasks with a limited and controlled set of applications and hardware, and comparing that to an end users "daily driver" that is constantly having software, hardware, and drivers being installed and uninstalled on it, well then clearly you're comparing apples to oranges and the post you just made carries no value. I too work in IT and I too have seen these Unix boxes run for years and years and years. And, those machines are desktops with a very limited number of apps running on them that are very tightly administered. Put a Windows 7 machine in that same scenario and it too will run for years and decades without issue.
If you really want to fairly compare Unix to Windows 7 then you need to compare in the other direction, too. Go install Unix on all of your users laptops and let them use that as their primary, sole computer to run all of their business and pesonal apps from. Then let us know how that goes.