What do you think of this photo?

[e.rose]

Mh yes maby is monitor cos i dont see it over exposed. I will try tomorrow another monitor.

Have you ever calibrated your monitor? You may want to consider doing that. :sillysmi:

 

[zhoak]

Mh yes maby is monitor cos i dont see it over exposed. I will try tomorrow another monitor.

Have you ever calibrated your monitor? You may want to consider doing that. :sillysmi:

I dont know how to do it u.u but yes I have seen the photo in other monitor and i dont like the light nor the color >.<

 

[e.rose]

Mh yes maby is monitor cos i dont see it over exposed. I will try tomorrow another monitor.

Have you ever calibrated your monitor? You may want to consider doing that. :sillysmi:

I dont know how to do it u.u but yes I have seen the photo in other monitor and i dont like the light nor the color >.<

You need to calibrate your monitors.

I didn't change the light or the colors, I corrected your exposure and your white balance, haha.

You may not like the way I did some of the other edits to it, and that's totally fine, but that doesn't change the fact that your white balance is off and your underexposed in the photo you posted.

Seriously, look into monitor calibrators.

 

[limr32 1]

Just out of curiosity, what focal length was this shot at? It feels a bit wider than a normal portrait length. Could just be my eyes playing tricks on me....

I thought the same thing. The head and nose seem to look larger than..... I was wondering if the head was ps on top of the body. I just did not want to say it.

Just out of curiosity, what focal length was this shot at? It feels a bit wider than a normal portrait length. Could just be my eyes playing tricks on me....

I thought the same thing. The head and nose seem to look larger than..... I was wondering if the head was ps on top of the body. I just did not want to say it.

I tried to beat around the bush & all with the question about the focal length, and then you just came right out and said it, didn't you? ;-)

I'm glad someone else mentioned this. I don't think it's about focal length, but about post-processing the size of her waist. Look at the original and then the edits. She's nipped waaaay too much in order to create a curvy, slimmer figure, or maybe just to smooth some of the folds in the shirt near her waist. The original is much better, more natural.

 

[zhoak]

Just out of curiosity, what focal length was this shot at? It feels a bit wider than a normal portrait length. Could just be my eyes playing tricks on me....

I thought the same thing. The head and nose seem to look larger than..... I was wondering if the head was ps on top of the body. I just did not want to say it.

I thought the same thing. The head and nose seem to look larger than..... I was wondering if the head was ps on top of the body. I just did not want to say it.

I tried to beat around the bush & all with the question about the focal length, and then you just came right out and said it, didn't you? ;-)

I'm glad someone else mentioned this. I don't think it's about focal length, but about post-processing the size of her waist. Look at the original and then the edits. She's nipped waaaay too much in order to create a curvy, slimmer figure, or maybe just to smooth some of the folds in the shirt near her waist. The original is much better, more natural.

Mmm no, the clothes were a size 42 cos the shop has only big sizes for fat people and the model (me) wears a size 32... so it looks like rap clothes when its a corset and it has to be fiting the body curves, apart than i look totally fat. So i didnt made thiner waist, just fit the clothes into the body. (here are examples of the real body without liquify filter and normal focal length):

https://www.facebook.com/Veronika.A...07778_n.jpg&size=600,900&fbid=164569873740531


https://www.facebook.com/Veronika.A...51336_n.jpg&size=600,900&fbid=164569887073863


https://www.facebook.com/Veronika.A...0.1392297024./163746120489573/?type=3&theater


https://www.facebook.com/Veronika.A...0.1392297017./167820603415458/?type=3&theater


So for me making photos where traditional basque clothes looks like rap clothes and not the correct way of carry it, its totally the worse thing i could made. I also did the same in other photo of the same serie with other model that was 34 size and had to wear a 38:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...882515.-2207520000.1392297440.&type=3&theater

If you see im not friendly with making artificial girls nor i change any shape of the faces for make it more beautiful (just a little skin things like grains that goes in days and a little of light but i dont put any blur on skin), also i dont change body shapes, but in this case i had 5 sizes bigger clothes for all models and the solution was made smaller sizes in postproduction. And I know how they look in bra and pants.

 

[Designer]

I looked at the photos on your Facebook page, and I see some problems with the white balance.

Please have your monitor corrected, and make sure your camera is set to the correct white balance as well. Considering the clothes didn't fit you, I think you did as much as you could.

Next shoot, have someone gather the large clothes in back and clamp them so you won't have so much to do in making corrections in post production.

 

[zhoak]

I looked at the photos on your Facebook page, and I see some problems with the white balance.

Please have your monitor corrected, and make sure your camera is set to the correct white balance as well. Considering the clothes didn't fit you, I think you did as much as you could.

Next shoot, have someone gather the large clothes in back and clamp them so you won't have so much to do in making corrections in post production.

You mean all my photos of Zhoak phtography page are wrong? O.O OMG

If you refer the ones of me as a model of my model page, them are from other fotographers....

hope not all my photos are wrong T.T

I tried to put this (i dont know the name in english) in the clothes:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_y3oeP1wK8ms/Spvo4CplLZI/AAAAAAAABhM/jAk39TPhkWs/s320/imperdible01.jpg

but it was damaging a little them, the corsets are of a "strong cloth" and it leaves a small hole, and they need to sell the clothes and have to return them in perfect condition. Otherwise i had to pay them, so I was scared of put them. >.<

But i won't do much more photos to this shop if they dont carry normal thin sizes, I will try another shop. Even if you put that things, 5 sizes more never will look as good as the right size. And also even if i put that things in the corset, the shirt still is so big and inside the corset making much space fat.

 

[e.rose]

You mean all my photos of Zhoak phtography page are wrong? O.O OMG If you refer the ones of me as a model of my model page, them are from other fotographers.... hope not all my photos are wrong T.T I tried to put this (i dont know the name in english) in the clothes: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_y3oeP1wK8ms/Spvo4CplLZI/AAAAAAAABhM/jAk39TPhkWs/s320/imperdible01.jpg but it was damaging a little them, the corsets are of a "strong cloth" and it leaves a small hole, and they need to sell the clothes and have to return them in perfect condition. Otherwise i had to pay them, so I was scared of put them. >.< But i won't do much more photos to this shop if they dont carry normal thin sizes, I will try another shop. Even if you put that things, 5 sizes more never will look as good as the right size. And also even if i put that things in the corset, the shirt still is so big and inside the corset making much space fat.

Next time get some of these:

http://cdn.tradebit.org/usr/stock-photos/pub/9002/815950.jpg

Or these:

http://www.ryman.co.uk/Catalogue/Ryman/large/global/images/main/07/0741035201.jpg

You can find them at office supply places and they should make fairly big sizes. They work well as clothing clips and don't leave holes :sillysmi:

Sent from my iPhone using PhotoForum

 

[zhoak]

Ohh yes you are right that ones are better

 

[Designer]

You mean all my photos of Zhoak phtography page are wrong?

My comment was concerning the white balance. I mean that your photo of the other girl show two different colors. One is probably close to correct, but who knows? So you need to get the same clothing and match the colors more accurately. After you get your monitor calibrated, and make your camera's white balance read true, then your colors will be more accurate.

Yes, if another photographer, then you have little control over the white balance.

 

[Designer]

I tried to put this (i dont know the name in english) in the clothes:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_y3oeP1wK8ms/Spvo4CplLZI/AAAAAAAABhM/jAk39TPhkWs/s320/imperdible01.jpg

The English term is "safety pin". It is a pin, and the cover makes it "safety".

 

[zhoak]

I tried to put this (i dont know the name in english) in the clothes:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_y3oeP1wK8ms/Spvo4CplLZI/AAAAAAAABhM/jAk39TPhkWs/s320/imperdible01.jpg

The English term is "safety pin". It is a pin, and the cover makes it "safety".

Ok thanks. XD I have baby level english

 

[Designer]

Ok thanks. XD I have baby level english

Think nothing of it. I'm the same with other languages myself.

 

[zhoak]

OMG I'm in a Mac now.. yes, near all my photos are dark and ugly T.T arfffffffffjrbfjwrhbrjfurwkrurbfyr but this guys that calibrate monitors cost much money U.U

 

[e.rose]

OMG I'm in a Mac now.. yes, near all my photos are dark and ugly T.T arfffffffffjrbfjwrhbrjfurwkrurbfyr but this guys that calibrate monitors cost much money U.U

Monitor calibrators are about $200 or so.

It's certainly not *cheap*, but it'll be worth it when you get your pennies scraped together.

Mine stopped working after I updated my OS, so that sucks. But I plan on getting another one once I have enough cash, because it's necessary, as you've discovered. Haha.