Braineack
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2013
- Messages
- 13,214
- Reaction score
- 5,613
- Location
- NoVA
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I still can't believe this. This is the current embed photo code:
Now Flickr says they want to force you to link back to Flickr, fine, but they actually removed the line of txt under the photo that would actually display the word Flickr in txt for all the damn search robots to pick up on?!
What they did before was clever. there was actually 3 links. That's SO much better for them and us.
You put a direct link on the photo itself, you put a text link on the title, you put a link to the member's photostream directly, and then you added text to advertise what damn site the photo was posted:
Steuben Glass Eagle by The Braineack, on Flickr
This manner looks so much better for the poster and actually advertises, for free, where the damn photo is hosted. For a robot searching for links and text, the previous embed code was worlds ahead--in the manner you were able to use it, and in the way it functions.
:facepalm:
Now Flickr says they want to force you to link back to Flickr, fine, but they actually removed the line of txt under the photo that would actually display the word Flickr in txt for all the damn search robots to pick up on?!
What they did before was clever. there was actually 3 links. That's SO much better for them and us.
You put a direct link on the photo itself, you put a text link on the title, you put a link to the member's photostream directly, and then you added text to advertise what damn site the photo was posted:
Steuben Glass Eagle by The Braineack, on Flickr
This manner looks so much better for the poster and actually advertises, for free, where the damn photo is hosted. For a robot searching for links and text, the previous embed code was worlds ahead--in the manner you were able to use it, and in the way it functions.
:facepalm: