I think you misunderstood what I wrote. Anyways, I have $2000 in Canon lenses, buying the Nikon for me would be a lot more expensive for me now. And again, I'd rather have a higher end crop body that gives me better AF, more FPS and other stuff that makes sure I don't miss a shot shooting stuff that can't be missed and repeated, and also, again, my 200mm lens is over 300mm on the crop body which is enough reach for me while 200mm on FF wouldn't be and I'd have to crop. And again, sport, wildlife, bird shooters etc.. can't you see it from the other perspective? All of us shooting APS-C KNOW what full frame does better, and it's NOT better for everything and everyone. I'd gladly use a D610 when shooting portraits, I KNOW that it'll do better then any APS-C, but I rarely do that, my job is every other kind of fast paced events where I'd benefit more from D7200 or D500 then D610 or D750. Watch the Z. Arias video that I posted if you haven't. EDIT: Someone shooting medium format could say the same things about FF that you're saying about APS-C. Why aren't you using medium format?