What's new

What do you think of this signature?

The symbol is totally unnecessary. I think your name works well, maybe a little less opacity to the lettering.
 
The symbol is totally unnecessary. I think your name works well, maybe a little less opacity to the lettering.

Cool.. trying to spice things up thats all. Dont want to look like Dad With Camera :). I will reduce the opacity.
 
I updated it. Sorry, flickr + LR3 is confusing. Changed opacity, replaced photograpy with usagan.com
 
Name and the .com would be better in my opinion, that partial aperture sysmbol probably bugs me only because I know what it is. For me it's just not working with it - the name is a good font and looks cool on its own.
 
good idea... ill post the revision soon.
 
I tried putting only USAGANI.COM (W/ aperture U, but I dont really like it). How about color? Is there something I could do to enhance it?
 
Try keeping the opacity low, so the background becomes part of the lettering.
 
Is the name Sagani? ........;)



Have you tried any different fonts?





*remember these are just my thoughts, you ultimately really should be the one who loves the result.
 
Pierre.. You are helping me a lot. Ran out of thanks LOL. You brought up a good point though. Spent quite a bit of time with the logo because Im not graphic designer and vector is very confusing. Didnt really want to ditch the logo because the time spent.. but maybe you are right LOL.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom